Liquidity Fragmentation and the Price Impact of ETF Flows
Log in to collectOnsite backtest IDE
Quant Buffet native backtest IDEEdit and run Quant Buffet Python for Liquidity Fragmentation and the Price Impact of ETF Flows in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)
Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.
from __future__ import annotations
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metricsASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
state = {"last": None}
def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
return
key = (dt.year, dt.month)
if state["last"] == key:
return
state["last"] = key
long = [
s for s in cols
if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
]
weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)
ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
return on_day, readyengine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})Live backtest performance
Accent = strategy · dashed grey = buy-and-hold benchmark
Export to your platform
Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Liquidity Fragmentation and the Price Impact of ETF Flows
# Detected pattern: Mean reversion
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.
from AlgorithmImports import *
class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
def Initialize(self):
self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
self.SetCash(100000)
tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
self.symbols = []
for t in tickers:
if "-" in t: # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
else:
self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
self.Schedule.On(
self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
self.Rebalance,
)
# Logic: Buy when return z-score < -1 over 20 days.
def Rebalance(self):
import numpy as np
picks = []
for symbol in self.symbols:
hist = self.History(symbol, 20 + 5, Resolution.Daily)
if hist.empty: continue
close = hist["close"]
if hasattr(close, "unstack"):
close = close.unstack(level=0).iloc[:, 0]
rets = close.pct_change().dropna()
if len(rets) < 20: continue
window = rets.iloc[-20:]
z = (window.iloc[-1] - window.mean()) / (window.std() or 1e-9)
if z < -1:
picks.append(symbol)
w = 1.0 / len(picks) if picks else 0.0
for symbol in self.symbols:
self.SetHoldings(symbol, w if symbol in picks else 0.0)
Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.
Academic paper
Teaser
Enter when short-horizon z-score is deeply negative; exit near zero. Universe: BTC-USD, ETH-USD. Parameters: lookback=20; entry_z=-1.0; exit_z=0.0; rebalance=daily. Rebalanced on the engine's template schedule with 5 bps commission and 2 bps slippage.
Strategy in a nutshell
This paper develops a theoretical model of price impact in fragmented cryptocurrency markets, where ETF-driven order flow must be routed across heterogeneous exchanges with varying liquidity depth. Extending Kyle (1985) to a multi-venue setting, I derive an aggregate price impact function that is linear for moderate flows but becomes convex when flows exceed any single venue's capacity. The model generates four testable predictions: (1) linear price impact for moderate flows, (2) volatility amplification, (3) permanent price impact with no reversal, and (4) flow-driven return momentum. Using 563 trading days of net flow data from all U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs (January 2024-April 2026), sourced from Farside Investors, I confirm all four predictions. An instrumental variables approach using lag
Economic rationale
Short-horizon overreaction produces temporary dislocations that reverse toward a local mean. Related evidence from “Liquidity Fragmentation and the Price Impact of ETF Flows: A Model of Cross-Venue Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets”: This paper develops a theoretical model of price impact in fragmented cryptocurrency markets, where ETF-driven order flow must be routed across heterogeneous exchanges with varying liquidity depth. Extending Kyle (1985) to a multi-venue setting, I derive an aggregate price impact function that is linear for moderate flows but becomes convex when flows exceed any single venue's capacity. The model generates four testable predictions: (1) linear price impact for moderate flows, (2) volatility ampl