Anti-Matthew Effect
Log in to collectOnsite backtest IDE
Quant Buffet native backtest IDEEdit and run Quant Buffet Python for Anti-Matthew Effect in the browser. Results update live with equity, drawdown, and metrics charts. Allowed: backtest.data, backtest.engine, backtest.metrics, numpy, pandas. Define ASSETS and make_on_day(prices). Shortcut: Ctrl+Enter. API docs →
Quant Buffet syntax cheat sheet (copy / insert)
Paste these fragments into the editor. The sandbox rejects QuantConnect, os, and network libraries.
from __future__ import annotations
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from backtest.data import load_daily_prices
from backtest.engine import EngineConfig, PortfolioEngine
from backtest.metrics import compute_metricsASSETS = ["SPY", "QQQ", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]def make_on_day(prices: pd.DataFrame):
cols = [c for c in ASSETS if c in prices.columns]
sma = prices[cols].rolling(200, min_periods=200).mean()
state = {"last": None}
def on_day(engine: PortfolioEngine, dt: pd.Timestamp) -> None:
if sma.loc[dt].isna().all():
return
key = (dt.year, dt.month)
if state["last"] == key:
return
state["last"] = key
long = [
s for s in cols
if pd.notna(prices.at[dt, s]) and pd.notna(sma.at[dt, s])
and prices.at[dt, s] > sma.at[dt, s]
]
weights = {} if not long else {s: 1.0 / len(long) for s in long}
engine.set_target_weights(dt, weights)
ready = sma.dropna(how="all").index.min() if sma.notna().any().any() else None
return on_day, readyengine.set_target_weights(dt, {"SPY": 0.60, "BIL": 0.40})Live backtest performance
Export to your platform
Transform Quant Buffet lab code (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine) into native classes for a third-party IDE — then copy and paste.
# Generated from Quant Buffet → QuantConnect LEAN
# Strategy: Anti-Matthew Effect
# Detected pattern: SMA trend
# Source uses Quant Buffet lab APIs (ASSETS + make_on_day / PortfolioEngine).
# Review fees, data, and risk before live trading — educational export only.
from AlgorithmImports import *
class QuantBuffetExport(QCAlgorithm):
def Initialize(self):
self.SetStartDate(2010, 1, 1)
self.SetCash(100000)
tickers = ["SPY", "TLT", "GLD", "BIL"]
self.symbols = []
for t in tickers:
if "-" in t: # crypto proxy e.g. BTC-USD
self.symbols.append(self.AddCrypto(t.replace("-USD", ""), Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
else:
self.symbols.append(self.AddEquity(t, Resolution.Daily).Symbol)
self.Schedule.On(
self.DateRules.MonthStart(self.symbols[0]),
self.TimeRules.AfterMarketOpen(self.symbols[0], 30),
self.Rebalance,
)
# Logic: Long assets where close > SMA(200); equal-weight; monthly.
def Rebalance(self):
longs = []
for symbol in self.symbols:
hist = self.History(symbol, 200 + 5, Resolution.Daily)
if hist.empty: continue
close = hist["close"].unstack(level=0).iloc[:, 0] if hasattr(hist["close"], "unstack") else hist["close"]
if len(close) < 200: continue
if float(close.iloc[-1]) > float(close.iloc[-200:].mean()):
longs.append(symbol)
weight = 1.0 / len(longs) if longs else 0.0
for symbol in self.symbols:
self.SetHoldings(symbol, weight if symbol in longs else 0.0)
Exported code uses the platform’s native classes and libraries. Install dependencies in your third-party IDE, then run. Validate before live trading.
Academic paper
The 'Matthew Effect' in Asset Returns: Winners and Losers from Entry
Fanis Papamichalis
- University of Oxford
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3918613
Strategy in a nutshell
This strategy trades CRSP stocks using data from WRDS, Compustat, and NIPA. Markups are calculated as sales divided by cost of goods sold, adjusted by industry-specific output elasticity under a Cobb-Douglas specification. Stocks are double-sorted into quintiles by size (sales) and markups. The portfolio goes long on the largest size and highest markup quintile and short on the smallest size and lowest markup quintile. Positions are value-weighted and rebalanced annually.
Economic rationale
The strategy is grounded in demand elasticity and entry-cost dynamics. High-markup firms with inelastic demand can better withstand competition and resource shifts, especially under rising entry costs, producing higher expected returns. These conditions generate the “Anti-Matthew effect,” explaining muted size effects in recent markets.